Previously stats, in his usual stalking fashion, noted that I was banned from the stronglifts forum;
http://seriousstrength.yuku.com/reply/16761/t/knee-extensions-and-useable-strength.html#reply-16761
One of the reasons for this was that I disagreed with a fellow who argued that a fellow who was strong at fulls would be strong at partials. This is a not uncommon argument amongst HITists - indeed it is one I used in my HIT days, i.e. it was foolish to do partials when one could do full range resistance exercise for full range strength.
Ever the experimentalist I have tested out my hypothesis a number of times, most recently below;
My buddy Mitch is stronger at fulls than me and lifts 716 lbs in the above lift which is far stronger than the average untrained person would hoist.I lift 1114 lbs which is 398 lbs more than Mitch.
Thus Mitch is strong at partials because he is strong at fulls but he is not as strong as if he'd actually trained partials, i.e. fulls do not maximise ones strength in all ranges of motion.
By the way... stats have you experienced any gains from your scientific randomised superslow training? Its just that after your many, many posts when Fred asked you for evidence of your lifting expertise you mysteriously went quiet...



